Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Annals of Thoracic Medicine. 2007; 2 (1): 23-25
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-81792

ABSTRACT

Mechanical ventilation is commonly required in critically ill pregnant patients, requiring ICU admission, with higher morbidity and mortality related to airway management. Alternatively, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation [NIPPV] is increasingly used to treat nonpregnant patients. Pregnancy has been a contraindication to its use. We would like to report a case series of successful use of NIPPV in pregnancy. NIPPV is increasingly used to treat hypoxemic respiratory failure. It has rarely been used during pregnancy. On the other hand, acute respiratory failure [ARF] remains a leading cause of ICU admission in obstetric patients. The use of NIPPV in managing ARF in pregnant patients was not investigated. We report the outcome of treatment with NIPPV of four sickle cell disease pregnant patients with ARF caused by acute chest syndrome. Median APACHE II score for the four cases was 27. Intubation was avoided in all cases. None had aspiration. Mean duration of NIPPV was 40 h with ICU discharge after a mean of 4 days


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy Outcome , Respiration, Artificial/methods
2.
Saudi Medical Journal. 2006; 27 (8): 1244-1247
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-80902

ABSTRACT

The current advanced trauma life support manual states that patients with significant hypoxia namely, SaO2 <90% on room air as a result of pulmonary contusion should be intubated and ventilated within the first hour of injury. Recently, several researchers have shown improved outcomes when patients with acute respiratory failure are managed with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation NIPPV. Trauma patients may also benefit from this therapy. We report a case of 15-year-old boy with isolated flail chest and pulmonary contusion, who was intubated in the emergency room, and was managed successfully with the NIPPV in the intensive care unit ICU despite, having had aspiration pneumonia early in the course of his stay. After initial stabilization, he failed a spontaneous breathing trial. Due to absence of contraindications to the use of NIPPV, the patient was extubated on day 7 from pressure support ventilation of 15 cmH2O and positive end expiratory pressure of 8 cmH2O to immediate NIPPV use. Three days later after a total of 50 hours of NIPPV use in the ICU the patient was successfully discharged home


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Flail Chest/diagnostic imaging , Life Support Care , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Emergency Treatment , Emergency Service, Hospital , Treatment Outcome , Hypoxia/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL